17/04/2013
And Fenavega The MP 595 Autor: Net Marinha
The National Federation of Navigation (Fenavega), asked the maintenance of an item of MP, which is: "the extinction of the differentiation of the concept of load itself and others, which certainly expedite the granting of terminals, will frame larger amount of users and provide increased competitiveness of terminals, whether Use Terminals Private Rooms (TUP), Cargo Transshipment Stations (ETCs) terminals or shipping companies. "
But criticized several other items: "In view of the entity, the private areas (located inside or outside the Polygonal Organized Port) should be handled by another device. Even as adjustments in MP 595, the organization suggests the observance of amendments 601, 604-615 and 618, which differ timely treatments given to private terminals (inside or outside the Polygonal Organized Port) and public; inclusion of amendments 205 and 555 provide for the permanence of the current assignments of the Port Authority Councils (PACs), since these instruments society participation in port management. For Fenavega, the MP should not legislate area essentially private and cites that 90% of existing terminals in inland navigation are private - investment is solely the entrepreneur, vital for connecting regions devoid of public port infrastructure and therefore , bear the burden of investment in their own terminals. "
He adds: "Terminals are not always classified as PUTs or ETCs as part of the structure of cargo shipping companies. Soon, their records are not considered by the relationship Antaq port terminals There are well over 130 private terminals (data Antaq April 2012). Only in the state of Pará, there are over 1,000 companies (active) with registration for the activity of navigation (the data JUCEPA 2012). Whereas most have at least one terminal to perform their activities, there is a disparity of information. "
